<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meera Syal: Life Isn&#8217;t All Ha Ha Hee Hee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spikemagazine.com/0100meerasyal.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spikemagazine.com/0100meerasyal.php</link>
	<description>Books, Music, Art, Ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Snig</title>
		<link>http://www.spikemagazine.com/0100meerasyal.php#comment-37687</link>
		<dc:creator>Snig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spikemagazine.com/wordpress/?p=163#comment-37687</guid>
		<description>heyyy really liked ur review.. agree with u on many things ... Im a student doing a research paper on this book and i was exploring the use of nature in this book .. 
incase u noticed more, instead of having long descrptive paras abt the setting sun etc etc Syal uses nature more like a slient observer .. its almost like a fourth voice thruout the book. also the refernces arent long and drawn out theyre sumtimes very subtle-one worded .. or max to a few lines .. 
could anyone hus red this book give me their opinions on this angle ... 

Thanx a lottt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heyyy really liked ur review.. agree with u on many things &#8230; Im a student doing a research paper on this book and i was exploring the use of nature in this book ..<br />
incase u noticed more, instead of having long descrptive paras abt the setting sun etc etc Syal uses nature more like a slient observer .. its almost like a fourth voice thruout the book. also the refernces arent long and drawn out theyre sumtimes very subtle-one worded .. or max to a few lines ..<br />
could anyone hus red this book give me their opinions on this angle &#8230; </p>
<p>Thanx a lottt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

