And, of course, there were numbers of collaborators in Nazi-occupied Europe. This is hardly evidence of the legitimacy of the Nazi occupiers.

In what way should a reviewer be ‘impartial’ or ‘ historically objective’ in reviewing a biography of Mosley? A review is not a work of academic scholarship. Has Lee read the biography itself? It is interesting that Lee praises Skidelsky’s biography (which I have read), clearly purely because it paints a more sympathetic picture. But is synpathy really the rest of impartiality? I suspect Lee’s politics are to be found somewhere on the Right. His idea of impartiality is that only minor criticism should be made of any figure on the Right.

Many of Mosley’s followers suffered imprisonment without trial (at least 1100 in the war), loss of jobs, abuse and general hostility. We certainly didn’t endure that to support the evil meglomaniac described in Dorril’s deeply flawed book. And we knew him personally so we knew what he was really like. Mosley had brains, guts and an infinite power to charm. The world will not see his like again for many a long year.

Anyway he lost, his enemies won and you can see the result: credit crunch, never ending wars that are nothing to do with us, urban decay, drugs, disease, crime – all rampant. You can’t blame him for that, a Mosley government would never have let it happen. And incidentally nobody is campaigning harder for justice for the Arab and Islamic people suffering from 60 years of state sponsored Israeli terrorism.

Everyone knows the BUF was at its height before anyone even considered it anti-Semitic, when it had some 40-50,000 members and the backing of the daily mail. When the BUF openly allowed anti Semites to ‘do their own thing’ it suffered two fold; it did not throw itself into anti Semitism and refused to merge with the imperial fascist league and other Nazi affiliated organisations, and the BUF suffered for not being anti-Semitic enough as the party split over the issue when its leading anti Semitic intellectuals went off to form the national socialist league (all 60 of them). As for Oswald Mosley he was not a racist and made it abundantly clear that enacting one is impractical and counter productive. That said as a scholar on the subject, I would be interested to know if you could provide me with any sourced evidence that Oswald Mosley was a racist, I am not closed to the notion but the onus is on you to prove it. As for conspiracy theorist is was sir Oswald that said “Anyone who knows how difficult it is to keep a secret among three men – particularly if they are married – knows how absurd is the idea of a worldwide secret conspiracy consciously controlling all mankind by its financial power; in real, clear analysis”

Now, you don’t have to be a “noisy communist” to vilify a “genius” like that. And that’s why, if your party leader really is black, he should be fucking ashamed of himself. And it’s also why you can fuck right off.

I am not any stranger to truth, I would not put the claims of Mosley’s opponents past him, but I have yet to find any evidence to support them, and thus tarnish his immaculate character. It would seem though the leftist glove puppet view of Mosley as the incarnation of political evil has gained popularity (even among some deranged authors it would seem), it is principally because it is only a certain crowd of noisy communists who feel the need to attack a man who has been dead for 20 years so they can give themselves a pat on the back. Mosley was clearly a genius whose innovative ideas were stifled by a system that resists progress, and whose later movement was simply a patriotic organisation of intelligent young reformists.

You suggest the autobiography of the man Mosley himself would offer a more balanced read. Presumably you and your “Integralist Party” (dig the logo dude! Where did you get THAT idea from?) would recommend Mein Kampf as the most measured historical view of Weimar Germany too.

Thankfully for connoseurs such as yourself and Lee there are two modern scholars who stand bravely against the oppressive Marxoid-Zionist grand conspiracy in modern historiography – the two Davids; Irving and Icke. Their many works are all available on Amazon. Integralists, lizard-spotters and Holocaust “sceptics” all welcome.