Bleak Job, Well Done
I know its not the done thing round these here parts but I do like a bit of Dickens, (put off by school, my interest was awakened by Orwell�s outstanding essay on the author) and I�m afraid I�m going to come over all middle-brow and say the BBC have done a good job with the adaptation of Bleak House they�re serialising at the moment.
Philip Hensher in The Guardian makes the case against, complaining of parts ommited, and more importantly the fact that TV and movie versions of Dickens always miss the power of his narration.
To an extent I sympathise, but that�s a problem with all adaptations of everything as far as I can see. I think I�ve yet to see any programme/film as good as its book version, but that doesn�t mean it can�t have a good go. With Dickens you certainly do lose out a lot by not getting his vibrant description of scenes.
But on the other hand Dickens� is comparatively light on that great enemy of the director, the Interior Monologue, while the grotesquery and humour of his characters (caricature to detractors) can and do come alive in a good adaptation like this. Hensher also makes a bit of a fool of himself when he wonders
�Does it, for instance, include that incomparable passage, Krook’s list of the names of Miss Flite’s 25 pet birds: “Hope, Joy, Youth, Peace, Rest, Life, Dust, Ashes, Waste, Want, Ruin, Despair, Madness, Death, Cunning, Folly, Words, Wigs, Rags, Sheepskin, Plunder, Precedent, Jargon, Gammon and Spinach?” It seems fairly unlikely; but, really, I just don’t want to know.�
Well Phillip you may not want to know, but the answer is it does, performed very well indeed by Mr Johnny Vegas. That�s the trouble with slagging something off you haven�t seen (I know, I�ve done it myself.)
The adaptation perhaps overdoes it in trying to cram more famous actors into a programme than has ever been done before. But they act well, and it certainly beats another series of Cutting It.
Other Splinters posts of interest:
- Dickens the journalist
- Those who can write novels, those who can’t write plays
- A Double Lie
- You might prefer not to
- File under: Journalists who don�t understand literature, vol 94
Make A Comment: ( 9 so far )
9 Responses to “Bleak Job, Well Done”
Molly from Sheffield
November 11th, 2005
You bloody buggering little shit!!
Ben G
November 11th, 2005
Ben G. You wouldn’t be Ben G I met at the McFly concert at the MEN Arena last year???
Anonymous
November 11th, 2005
Molly we were at school together! remember me??? its Tanna, I’m a fully qualified GP now!
Dr Tanna
November 11th, 2005
I am beset by smear tactics.
My observations about Dickens’ adpatations have been sullied beyond repair by your fiendish machinations.
Begone! Your damage has been done!
Ben G
November 11th, 2005
Dr Tanna??? I don’t know you.
Molly from Sheffield
November 11th, 2005
glasses, Mick Jagger hair, drives a mini…..???? any bells ringing?
Dr Tanna
November 11th, 2005
No nothing.
Molly from Sheffield
November 11th, 2005
OK if I were to say the word ‘Rosebud’ Yes; thought that would make you remember
Dr Tanna
November 11th, 2005
Ben I find your comment; ‘yet to see any programme/film as good as its book version’ interesting and I must say a little surprising. For instance the film version of Tomb Raider was much better than the novel on which it was based